<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Clinton At It Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/</link>
	<description>Current Events &#124; In His Own Words &#124; If He Blogged...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 13:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: bright strangely</title>
		<link>http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>bright strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 03:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/#comment-392</guid>
		<description>bush may be an underacheiving, overmatched ideologue, but he believes himself a hero. i see no reason to think he knows how depressing his life looks to me. thanks for responding though. i didn't even know i had the talking points right! i would encourage you to remember these words from franklin  which i just learned from your blog, "I resolve to speak ill of no man whatever, not even in a matter of truth; but rather by some means excuse the faults I hear charged upon others, and upon proper occasions speak all the good I know of every body."

at least, until after the nominee is decided? i'd kind of like to keep this republic away from the republicans. however destructive team clinton may seem, they left rather a lot for bush to destroy properly. as far as i know, these were my own opinions, but feel free to correct me again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bush may be an underacheiving, overmatched ideologue, but he believes himself a hero. i see no reason to think he knows how depressing his life looks to me. thanks for responding though. i didn&#8217;t even know i had the talking points right! i would encourage you to remember these words from franklin  which i just learned from your blog, &#8220;I resolve to speak ill of no man whatever, not even in a matter of truth; but rather by some means excuse the faults I hear charged upon others, and upon proper occasions speak all the good I know of every body.&#8221;</p>
<p>at least, until after the nominee is decided? i&#8217;d kind of like to keep this republic away from the republicans. however destructive team clinton may seem, they left rather a lot for bush to destroy properly. as far as i know, these were my own opinions, but feel free to correct me again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Tyler</title>
		<link>http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/#comment-377</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/#comment-377</guid>
		<description>Hi Bright Strangely/Strangely Bright;

Whether Mr. Franklin would or would not agree with me regarding the Clintons' tendency to "scatter thorns" along their political path, I suppose we can never know for sure. Invoking him is what I do here :-)

Certainly, the Clintons do not have the market cornered when it comes to dirty "Pool"itics.

I am amused, however, that your veiled rebuttal regarding GWB and BHO is nearly the same as the talking points on this subject put out by the Clinton campaign last week.

I'm afraid I disagree with you regarding the Bush administration.

Mr. Bush was - and is - an underachieving, over-matched, two-dimensional ideologue who is surrounded by, and completely enmeshed within, a cadre of dangerous, radical, and thoroughly disingenuous political machinators not seen around here since the days of the Teapot Dome.

Mrs. Clinton "pragmatic?"

If you mean hard-boiled and/or sober, I suppose I concur. She may also be a fine human being. I just don't trust her, nor can I personally sanction her tactics and strategies, dreams notwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bright Strangely/Strangely Bright;</p>
<p>Whether Mr. Franklin would or would not agree with me regarding the Clintons&#8217; tendency to &#8220;scatter thorns&#8221; along their political path, I suppose we can never know for sure. Invoking him is what I do here <img src='http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Certainly, the Clintons do not have the market cornered when it comes to dirty &#8220;Pool&#8221;itics.</p>
<p>I am amused, however, that your veiled rebuttal regarding GWB and BHO is nearly the same as the talking points on this subject put out by the Clinton campaign last week.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid I disagree with you regarding the Bush administration.</p>
<p>Mr. Bush was - and is - an underachieving, over-matched, two-dimensional ideologue who is surrounded by, and completely enmeshed within, a cadre of dangerous, radical, and thoroughly disingenuous political machinators not seen around here since the days of the Teapot Dome.</p>
<p>Mrs. Clinton &#8220;pragmatic?&#8221;</p>
<p>If you mean hard-boiled and/or sober, I suppose I concur. She may also be a fine human being. I just don&#8217;t trust her, nor can I personally sanction her tactics and strategies, dreams notwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bright strangely</title>
		<link>http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/#comment-376</link>
		<dc:creator>bright strangely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 20:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://benfranklin.worldhistoryblogs.com/2008/02/16/team-clinton-at-it-again/#comment-376</guid>
		<description>it's a shame that you had to invoke franklin here, i do not think he would agree with you. the bush administration has also been marked by courage, hope and optimism; they are not enough.

pragmatic leaders may not be as personally satisfying, but they are more trustworthy. then at least, you know the limits of their dreams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a shame that you had to invoke franklin here, i do not think he would agree with you. the bush administration has also been marked by courage, hope and optimism; they are not enough.</p>
<p>pragmatic leaders may not be as personally satisfying, but they are more trustworthy. then at least, you know the limits of their dreams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
